Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Played Correctly

  1. #1
    BubbleBoy is offline PNW Railbird
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    149

    Default Played Correctly

    Seat 1: Fruttil (3,030)
    Seat 2: TorstenKuhl (6,178)
    Seat 3: topflight8 (9,180)
    Seat 4: kelmar1303 (5,469)
    Seat 5: luismartinez87 (6,070)
    Seat 6: jgreeneswife (1,470)
    Seat 7: UmustBelieve (4,620)
    Seat 8: Me (2,610)
    Seat 9: ljs1977 (4,865)
    TorstenKuhl posts the small blind of 60
    topflight8 posts the big blind of 120
    The button is in seat #1
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt Me [Ac Kc]
    kelmar1303 folds
    luismartinez87 folds
    jgreeneswife calls 120
    UmustBelieve folds
    Me has 8 seconds left to act
    Me raises to 360
    ljs1977 folds
    Fruttil calls 360
    TorstenKuhl folds
    topflight8 folds
    jgreeneswife calls 240
    *** FLOP *** [3h As 5c]
    jgreeneswife checks
    Me bets 720
    Fruttil calls 720
    jgreeneswife folds
    *** TURN *** [3h As 5c] [8d]
    Me bets 1,530, and is all in
    Fruttil calls 1,530
    Me shows [Ac Kc]
    Fruttil shows [Qc Qd]
    *** RIVER *** [3h As 5c 8d] [Qs]
    Me shows a pair of Aces
    Fruttil shows three of a kind, Queens
    Fruttil wins the pot (5,760) with three of a kind, Queens
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 5,760 | Rake 0
    Board: [3h As 5c 8d Qs]
    Seat 1: Fruttil (button) showed [Qc Qd] and won (5,760) with three of a kind, Queens
    Seat 2: TorstenKuhl (small blind) folded before the Flop
    Seat 3: topflight8 (big blind) folded before the Flop
    Seat 4: kelmar1303 didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 5: luismartinez87 didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 6: jgreeneswife folded on the Flop
    Seat 7: UmustBelieve didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 8: Me showed [Ac Kc] and lost with a pair of Aces
    Seat 9: ljs1977 didn't bet (folded)


    Should I have moved all-in on the flop? Or is the result the same?

  2. #2
    whitey9999 is offline PNW Amateur
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    409

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    Yeh probably shove on flop, but he wouldve called anyway
    Just unlucky

  3. #3
    SwoopAE is offline PNW Semi-Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,034

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    LOL it's fine you bet bet bet and were ahead on every street and got called by a worse hand.

    This is a bad beat, there is nothing you can do about it, but it is not a hand worth posting for discussion as you clearly made the correct decision (maybe bet slightly less on the flop to induce action from hands you crush if anything) on each street and just got unlucky.

    Move onto the next hand and worry more about the hands where you get outplayed than the hands where you get unlucky. Learning to spot the difference between the two so that you can work on plugging leaks in your game is the difference between being a winning and losing player.

  4. #4
    SwoopAE is offline PNW Semi-Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,034

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    Quote Originally Posted by whitey9999 View Post
    Yeh probably shove on flop, but he wouldve called anyway
    Just unlucky
    Also this is terrible advice overbetting on this flop when we have his range completely smashed is a terrible idea. The bet size you made should be about the maximum amount we bet here as we WANT worse hands to call us here as they will usually have only 2-3 outs and we can then shove any turn.

  5. #5
    BubbleBoy is offline PNW Railbird
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    149

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    Quote Originally Posted by SwoopAE View Post
    LOL it's fine you bet bet bet and were ahead on every street and got called by a worse hand.

    This is a bad beat, there is nothing you can do about it, but it is not a hand worth posting for discussion as you clearly made the correct decision (maybe bet slightly less on the flop to induce action from hands you crush if anything) on each street and just got unlucky.

    Move onto the next hand and worry more about the hands where you get outplayed than the hands where you get unlucky. Learning to spot the difference between the two so that you can work on plugging leaks in your game is the difference between being a winning and losing player.

    Ok thanks. What about this hand? lol

  6. #6
    BubbleBoy is offline PNW Railbird
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    149

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    Seat 1: seibula (3,035)
    Seat 2: marco antonio10 (3,000)
    Seat 3: Turtle_NLP_ (3,725)
    Seat 4: RelayLaundry (2,910)
    Seat 5: papparuss (3,000)
    Seat 6: Fish_club (2,925)
    Seat 7: wiciu777 (3,275)
    Seat 8: Me (3,075)
    Seat 9: AlpacaTheBird (2,590)
    seibula posts the small blind of 15
    marco antonio10 posts the big blind of 30
    The button is in seat #9
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Me [Kc Ks]
    Turtle_NLP_ folds
    RelayLaundry folds
    Fish_club folds
    wiciu777 calls 30
    Me raises to 120
    AlpacaTheBird folds
    seibula folds
    marco antonio10 calls 90
    wiciu777 calls 90
    *** FLOP *** [Jd Qc 2h]
    marco antonio10 checks
    wiciu777 checks
    Me bets 300
    marco antonio10 raises to 900
    wiciu777 raises to 3,155, and is all in
    Me has 15 seconds left to act
    Me has requested TIME
    Me calls 2,655, and is all in
    marco antonio10 calls 1,980, and is all in
    wiciu777 shows [2d 2c]
    Me shows [Kc Ks]
    marco antonio10 shows [9d Qs]
    Uncalled bet of 200 returned to wiciu777
    *** TURN *** [Jd Qc 2h] [8c]
    *** RIVER *** [Jd Qc 2h 8c] [9s]
    wiciu777 shows three of a kind, Twos
    Me shows a pair of Kings
    wiciu777 wins the side pot (150) with three of a kind, Twos
    marco antonio10 shows two pair, Queens and Nines
    wiciu777 wins the main pot (9,015) with three of a kind, Twos
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 9,165 Main pot 9,015. Side pot 150. | Rake 0
    Board: [Jd Qc 2h 8c 9s]
    Seat 1: seibula (small blind) folded before the Flop
    Seat 2: marco antonio10 (big blind) showed [9d Qs] and lost with two pair, Queens and Nines
    Seat 3: Turtle_NLP_ didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 4: RelayLaundry didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 5: papparuss is sitting out
    Seat 6: Fish_club didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 7: wiciu777 showed [2d 2c] and won (9,165) with three of a kind, Twos
    Seat 8: Me showed [Kc Ks] and lost with a pair of Kings
    Seat 9: AlpacaTheBird (button) didn't bet (folded)


    Should I have folded? I registered 10min to a tourney and this is my 11th hand so I have no info on them.

  7. #7
    SwoopAE is offline PNW Semi-Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,034

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    At anything with a buyin below $5 its probably safe to call off here; anything higher or if villain is a breakeven/winning player and it's a pretty easy fold since his range should be 22, QJ pretty much (maybe some flatted QQ/JJ and KT/AQ as well, it depends)

    At micros they can have all sorts of random crap though so just dont fold overpairs. Basically, it depends on a) whether villain is a winning/breakeven player and b) the buyin level here

    In a vacuum I would say yes we can fold here though, there are no flush draws on board and with a bet and a raise villain is unlikely to 3bet a worse hand (AQ?) unless he is terrible, since you can't call with worse hands.

    What was the buyin level here and what are villain's stats? (both villains actually)

    Also if you have a close spot and no info you can quickly sharkscope or OPR them to find out at least if they're winning or losing players. I'd be more likely to call off against a losing player in this situation but i'm always folding to a winning player.
    Last edited by SwoopAE; 28-03-2011 at 08:45 PM.

  8. #8
    BubbleBoy is offline PNW Railbird
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    149

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    Quote Originally Posted by SwoopAE View Post
    At anything with a buyin below $5 its probably safe to call off here; anything higher or if villain is a breakeven/winning player and it's a pretty easy fold since his range should be 22, QJ pretty much (maybe some flatted QQ/JJ and KT/AQ as well, it depends)

    At micros they can have all sorts of random crap though so just dont fold overpairs. Basically, it depends on a) whether villain is a winning/breakeven player and b) the buyin level here

    In a vacuum I would say yes we can fold here though, there are no flush draws on board and with a bet and a raise villain is unlikely to 3bet a worse hand (AQ?) unless he is terrible, since you can't call with worse hands.

    What was the buyin level here and what are villain's stats? (both villains actually)

    Also if you have a close spot and no info you can quickly sharkscope or OPR them to find out at least if they're winning or losing players. I'd be more likely to call off against a losing player in this situation but i'm always folding to a winning player.

    I've never really looked at if they are a winning or losing player. Is that something I should be doing?

    I think it was a $26 tourney.

    I figured the only hands that could beat me are Q,J and 2,2 as I doubt he has A's, Q's or J's. But I also thought he could have K,Q or A,Q.

  9. #9
    SwoopAE is offline PNW Semi-Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,034

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    It's probably a fold in a $257 unless your opponent is down 50k or whatever then you just call it off since he's a spastic

    Obviously stat reads matter more than winning or losing player reads but its a good way to get a read on someone in a vacuum if you have timebank

  10. #10
    FSL009 is offline PNW Grinder
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    638

    Default Re: Played Correctly

    I would bet an extra BB pre-flop. 3x +1 for each caller, but doubt it changes much here.

    but the rest of the hand is fine and the end is just variance.

    Kd FTW

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •