does it get any worse than this... a poker stars classic

[joigazmik]

thankfully i was not part of this hand but leave it up to stars to come up with the wild ones.. i think the hand speaks for itself...PokerStars Game #13538135974: Tournament #68668668, $6.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (100/200) - 2007/11/29 - 07:13:14 (ET)Table '68668668 1' 9-max Seat #5 is the buttonSeat 1: paulgennep (4135 in chips) Seat 2: WardyBoy (6610 in chips) Seat 4: weewinnie (4610 in chips) Seat 5: rikrush (5500 in chips) Seat 6: Blackfleckie (2010 in chips) Seat 7: Joigazmik (2490 in chips) Seat 8: ray777 (4530 in chips) Seat 9: glodibarbi (3645 in chips) paulgennep: posts the ante 25WardyBoy: posts the ante 25weewinnie: posts the ante 25rikrush: posts the ante 25Blackfleckie: posts the ante 25Joigazmik: posts the ante 25ray777: posts the ante 25glodibarbi: posts the ante 25Blackfleckie: posts small blind 100Joigazmik: posts big blind 200*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to Joigazmik [Kd 4d]ray777: calls 200glodibarbi: calls 200paulgennep: calls 200WardyBoy: folds weewinnie: folds rikrush: folds Blackfleckie: raises 1785 to 1985 and is all-inJoigazmik: folds ray777: folds glodibarbi: calls 1785paulgennep: folds *** FLOP *** [Qc Jc 4h]*** TURN *** [Qc Jc 4h] [Ac]*** RIVER *** [Qc Jc 4h Ac] [Tc]*** SHOW DOWN ***Blackfleckie: shows [Kc Ks] (a Royal Flush)glodibarbi: shows [8c 9c] (a straight flush, Eight to Queen)Blackfleckie collected 4770 from potglodibarbi said, "wow"*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 4770 | Rake 0 Board [Qc Jc 4h Ac Tc]Seat 1: paulgennep folded before FlopSeat 2: WardyBoy folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 4: weewinnie folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 5: rikrush (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 6: Blackfleckie (small blind) showed [Kc Ks] and won (4770) with a Royal FlushSeat 7: Joigazmik (big blind) folded before FlopSeat 8: ray777 folded before FlopSeat 9: glodibarbi showed [8c 9c] and lost with a straight flush, Eight to Queenneed i say more???

[Fair Enough]

>i think the hand speaks for itself...>need i say more???Actually, yes.What's your point?Yes, an unusual and uncommon result: a royal flush over a straight flush. But not impossible. And look at the tournament number: #68668668. Sixty-eight million tourneys. I reckon a lot of pretty unusual things would happen over that period.>a poker stars classicAre you implying things like this only ever happen at PokerStars? Or that such hands happen more often at PokerStars than elsewhere? Or perhaps the RNG is rigged to drag in those millions more in $6.50 tournaments?Don't let it speak for itself. *You* speak. Tell us what you are thinking.

[Blu3B3ar]

Exactly what are you suggesting joigazmik?

[Simon Says]

that one really is just a doozyive seen just as bad with the usual donkies calling all in with rubbish and beating my AK and things but that flush on flush realy is a doozy as ive said

[nickkaka]

Anybody who thinks online poker is rigged is a losing player!What is a "doozy"