This is a situation which came up a little while ago, but is one for which I wanted to get a few more educated opinions.Early in a (low buy-in, low stack) tourney.UTG (c.4000?)MP (c.1400)Button (c.2300)Blinds 50/100UTG raises to 325, MP pushes all-in, it folds around to Button who says aloud "I've got shit but they're suited" and pushes stack in as well. UTG ums and ahs and finally calls stating aloud something to the effect of "I only have to put in 1975, and I know I'm behind you (MP) but I think I'm ahead of (Button), and I think I can get 1800 of it back from the side-pot, so I'm only risking 175, that's the most I can lose."MP shows JJButton shows Q4 'suited!'UTG shows . . . A3 offsuit!What do you think of this call by UTG?Do you agree with the statement that he "put in 1975 to win 1800"? Or is it more like "put in 1975 to win 900" (ie: just the Button's contribution to the side pot)?The Button's comments certainly aided the decision of UTG to call and should not have been made, but the Button may also have been angle-shooting to induce a call and could have had a monster.All comments welcomed and appreciated.BFB

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

