Humour is subjective.
One persons bad taste is anothers comedy gold!
If the thread was flooded with videos of WW1 vets then you would have a reason to get upset and call for moderator involvement etc..
Suggesting it would be funny if it was mentally ill people devalues your arguement significantly V man.
Bring on the comedy!!! (Offensive or otherwise)
This LOL thread is one of the best things about this forum
PokerStars Game #43061182586: Tournament #265694568, $44.00+$0.88 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level III (100/200) - 2010/04/23 0:46:51 ET
Table '265694568 1' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: thret (2330 in chips)
Seat 5: Gavs12 (330 in chips)
Seat 6: clownazz (340 in chips)
thret: posts the ante 40
Gavs12: posts the ante 40
clownazz: posts the ante 40
thret: posts small blind 100
Gavs12: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to thret [6c 2d]
clownazz: calls 200
thret: calls 100
Gavs12: checks
*** FLOP *** [As 4c 9s]
thret: checks
Gavs12: checks
clownazz: checks
*** TURN *** [As 4c 9s] [Qh]
thret: checks
Gavs12: checks
clownazz: checks
*** RIVER *** [As 4c 9s Qh] [3h]
thret: checks
Gavs12: checks
clownazz: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
thret: shows [6c 2d] (high card Ace)
Gavs12: shows [5s 6d] (high card Ace - Queen+Nine+Six+Five kicker)
clownazz: mucks hand
Gavs12 collected 720 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 720 | Rake 0
Board [As 4c 9s Qh 3h]
Seat 1: thret (small blind) showed [6c 2d] and lost with high card Ace
Seat 5: Gavs12 (big blind) showed [5s 6d] and won (720) with high card Ace
Seat 6: clownazz (button) mucked [2s 6s]
How did you learn to play poker? By playing darts? - The Grand
All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence, and then success is sure. - Mark Twain
Prosperity supposes capacity. Win the lottery, and you are an able man. Have but luck, and you will have the rest; be fortunate, and you will be thought great. - V Hugo
Look, the way I see it is:Originally Posted by Vman
If they were conscripts, lolz.
If they were volunteers, lolz.
Pawns have choices, despite what you'd think. You can choose to get caught up in nationalistic fever or not. You can choose whether to be influenced by government propaganda or not. You can choose whether to run into enemy artillery fire because some inbred [literally] general who only has epaulettes representing such because Daddy was a General and Daddy's daddy was a General and inbred gentlemen are required to ensure discipline and gentlemanly conduct and that.
Can you imagine barbaric troops with no officers to moderate their barbaric urges? They would likely display barbaric behaviour [instead of the cordial exchanges of a gentleman's war - taking turns to run into each other's machine guns and so forth, all polite and organised and very much in the spirit of the thing].
Or not.
When we have soldiers dying to repel an attack on Australian soil, talk to to me then. Until that point, you have invading troops attacking patriotic soldiers defending their home soils. From Australians.
Perhaps such pre-emptive invasions were appropriate. Perhaps every Australian who's fallen to enemy [defensive] fire is a hero who fell heroically - in must-win strategic campaigns. Perhaps there was no retardedly pointless / needless Australian military KIA's.
But that would be another argument one could discuss with me. And I strongly urge anyone considering doing that to place $ on the outcome. $ they are prepared to forfeit.
And - because of that - you can safely lolz. Conscripts or volunteers, they were idiots. Of that you can be as certain as one could possibly be. Except if one was betting on the likely outcome between a human body and entrenched / fixed position automatic fire. 50/50.
You know what I did last time someone told me to die for them?
I didn't.
:sickbrag
does every single post have to be a 50 page novel?
Because I'm god. Now sit down, things are about to get painful for you. And I'm setting the punishment at 1/100th as vociferous as your noose deserves.
I made the mistake, after posting the brilliant war post above, of checking out the first couple pages of this thread. I fully expected it to be a sub-par clone of many similar threads like it around the world. By page 4 or 5, I knew it would be one of the most terrible threads ever - but I was trapped by ethics to read the entire thing on the very rare chance you reversed your early noose.
You did not. Reverse. You accelerated - almost unbelievably so. On that note, car jokes? Almost never funny. But of the CRIMES you have committed in this thread, your car noose is almost forgiveable.
I make the point that - were it to cost me 1,000,000 - I would swap places with you in an instant. To laugh / find funny every terrible lame backfired humour attempt in the world? That would be glorious. No sarcasm.
Having said that, it's fucking embarrassing. Dude, you cannot post the entire history of 4Chan's [mostly] fail in a "LOL Thread" - it's not lol, it's fucking endless cringe. And it was cringe the first time it made me cringe, many years ago.
Why are you recycling the cringing? If there was a mod here with an eye for terrible, you would be IP banned. You are the First [1st] person I have told on the Internet that their high volume of content is just a bad thing overall.
Normally high volume is > no / low volume. Not with you. ROUNDS DOWN RANGE M F ER! DOWN range. You're firing into your feet and your face and fragments are hitting everyone around you.
Perhaps one of maybe 4 or 5 posts in this entire thread that could be objectively judged to be in accordance with the OP / title.
The fact that I saw this more often than a live pic can only be one of the greatest fucking miracles of my life.
There may be one of these that is funny on the Internet, but I have yet to see it. It's a stupid meme. For no-talent hack losers to match with stupid unfunny 'quips'. Almost anyone who posts it is probably a noose person. It's like a poasting tell. If sideways rain were a hint of an incoming storm.